starlocalnews.comIn The Community, With The Community, For the Community

Your Hometown:


Archives > Opinion > Star Staff

Doctor in the House

Published: Friday, October 5, 2012 4:36 PM CDT
With the Supreme Court about to make a decision on the constitutionality of "ObamaCare," I'm reminded of a book written last year by our local Congressman, Michael Burgess (26th District).


Dr. Burgess, who for 25 years was a practicing physician (OB/GYN) in North Texas, ran for Congress in 2002, after House Majority Leader Dick Armey announced that he would not run again. Burgess, who relates in the book the fire in the belly he experienced after the 9/11 terrorist attack, began to seek advice on how to run a political campaign. One of his most enthusiastic supporters was Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, who told him he'd "be perfect." The book takes the reader on an informative journey that begins with the author's description of his grandfather's medical practice in Canada, followed by his father's medical career that began in Noranda, Quebec, "a tiny mining village in the Canadian wilderness nearly 400 miles northwest of Montreal," but soon moved to the United States, ultimately settling in Denton, Texas.

Describing aspects of his own career, Dr. Burgess describes the way breast cancer used to be viewed when he started medical school in 1974. "Back then, there was no screening per se. Once a woman or her physician discovered a breast lump, she was scheduled for a biopsy. Before that biopsy began, however, the patient signed a consent form for a radical mastectomy. The conventional wisdom at the time was that if you operate and the biopsy reveals that the lump is malignant, you increased the likelihood of dissemination of disease if you didn't proceed immediately to the radical mastectomy. It made the whole process unbelievably unsettling for women.

The statistics said most lumps were benign. Nevertheless, we were asking women to consent to and be prepped for a radical mastectomy before we even knew whether or not there was a malignancy." Burgess points to the progress that has been made. "For example, when I started practice, if I recommended a mammogram to someone, it was an intensely emotional, even traumatic event. The patient would go home and tell her husband, 'The doctor has scheduled me for a mammogram. He must think I have breast cancer.' That was our old world. Now we're in a world in which mammograms are considered routine."

The congressman writes about the huge rise in malpractice insurance rates in the mid-1970s.

"An increasing number of Americans seemed to think catching a doctor in a mistake (real or perceived), or sometimes simply experiencing a negative outcome was tantamount to winning the lottery or hitting the jackpot. A new breed of plaintiff attorneys specializing in suing doctors, hospitals and drug companies started amassing astonishing fortunes by encouraging that very mindset." Stressing the need for tort reform, Burgess writes, "Although the pockets of plaintiff's lawyers get filled, this abuse of the court system exacts costs that go far beyond the jury awards and rising liability insurance premiums. The hidden costs to our economy are staggering. More and more doctors today at every level of the medical system feel forced to practice what has come to be called 'defensive medicine,' routinely ordering unnecessary tests, referrals, and procedures purely to protect themselves against allegations of negligence. By some estimates, nearly 90 percent of primary care physicians admit to succumbing to the pressure to engage in defensive medicine."

It's easy to relate to what Dr. Burgess says if you've ever been to a hospital to check out a minor discomfort and found yourself subjected to numerous procedures and exams, culminating in a medical bill that could bring on the ailment that the tests just revealed you didn't have. If you're a reader of non-fiction, and/or someone who enjoys delving into the inner circle of politics to learn how legislation like the Obama healthcare plan became law, you'll thoroughly enjoy this book. The chapter titled, "Seven things your doctor wishes you knew" is, in my estimation, has some of the most valuable nuggets of information about health and the healthcare system that you're likely to find in your lifetime. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who wrote the forward, said, "This book is a remarkable essay on life, medicine, health care, politics and Congress. It is so much more interesting and so much richer in human experience than most health policy books that I recommend it to every American."

Congressman Ron Paul, M.D., wrote, "My colleague Michael Burgess has written a compelling indictment of Obamacare, exposing how the legislation was rammed through Congress with little understanding of long-term consequences. He lays out a cogent argument that health care, like any other service, is best delivered by markets rather than government programs." Doctor in the House can be found on Amazon.com and other major booksellers.



Share this Article
Bookmark and Share




Article Rating
Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:
Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers.
In no way do they represent the view of Starlocalnews.com
You must register with a valid email to post comments.
Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.
Registered users sign in here:

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Become a Registered User

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

 
twitter Click here to subscribe to our newspaper
Submit a story Submit a photo Send a Letter